The Fraud Playbook: Building a Taxonomy to Slash MTTR
Implementing a structured approach to fraud incidents can dramatically reduce resolution times and enhance security.
Building a structured fraud taxonomy is not just smart; it's essential for survival in today's digital landscape.Back to all posts
The $50K Wake-Up Call
Imagine this: a critical payment processing system experiences an outage during peak hours, leading to a $50,000 loss in customer refunds due to fraudulent transactions. This scenario is not merely hypothetical; it underscores the urgent need for engineering leaders to implement a structured fraud response strategy. Without a robust framework, your organization risks not only financial loss but also reputational damage and customer trust erosion.
Why This Matters
Fraud incidents are on the rise, and the speed at which teams can respond is paramount. A well-defined fraud taxonomy allows teams to categorize incidents effectively, enabling quicker identification and resolution of issues. For engineering leaders, this means understanding the specific types of fraud—such as identity theft, deepfakes, and proxy candidates—so that targeted strategies can be employed. Moreover, a taxonomy simplifies communication across departments, ensuring everyone is on the same page during high-stakes incidents.
How to Implement It
response process. For example, if a voice mismatch is detected during an identity verification step, the tree should outline: Step 1: Validate the voice capture. Step 2: Cross-reference with stored voice samples. Step 3: Escalate to fraud analysis team if discrepancies persist. Guidelines for communicating with stakeholders.
Establish a Fraud Taxonomy: Define categories of fraud relevant to your organization, such as: Identity Verification Failures, Payment Fraud, Document Spoofing, Biometric Spoofing.
Develop Decision Trees: For each category, create decision trees that guide teams through the
Build Runbooks: Document specific actions for each type of incident, including evidence handling protocols. Ensure that each runbook is user-friendly, with clear steps that can be followed under pressure. Include: Initial assessment checklists, Tools for evidence collection,
Key Takeaways
- A well-structured fraud taxonomy is essential for quick identification and resolution of fraud incidents. - Decision trees streamline the response process, reducing the time taken to investigate and resolve fraud cases. - Effective runbooks enhance reviewer ergonomics, making it easier for teams to handle evidence and communicate effectively during incidents.
Key takeaways
- Establish a clear fraud taxonomy to streamline incident response.
- Implement decision trees to guide fraud investigations.
- Use concrete signals to enhance fraud detection and response.
Implementation checklist
- Create a fraud taxonomy that categorizes types of fraud incidents.
- Develop decision trees for common fraud scenarios.
- Build runbooks that outline specific actions for each incident type.
Questions we hear from teams
- What is a fraud taxonomy?
- A fraud taxonomy categorizes different types of fraud incidents to streamline identification and response efforts.
- How can decision trees help in fraud response?
- Decision trees guide teams through a structured response process, ensuring consistency and speed during incidents.
- What should be included in a fraud incident runbook?
- A runbook should outline specific actions for each incident type, including evidence handling and communication protocols.
Ready to secure your hiring pipeline?
Let IntegrityLens help you verify identity, stop proxy interviews, and standardize screening from first touch to final offer.
Watch IntegrityLens in action
See how IntegrityLens verifies identity, detects proxy interviewing, and standardizes screening with AI interviews and coding assessments.
