Automate Evidence Packs: Elevate Your Technical Screening

Streamline your hiring process by automating evidence packs that include code, video, and reviewer notes.

Automating evidence packs not only enhances reproducibility but also builds trust in your hiring process.
Back to all posts

## The $50K Hallucination Your AI model just hallucinated in production, costing your company $50K in customer refunds. This incident not only affects your bottom line but also erodes trust among stakeholders. As engineering leaders, you can't afford to overlook the importance of a robust technical screening process. A

failure in hiring can lead to hiring individuals who cannot deliver, resulting in cascading failures in your systems and applications. Automating evidence packs—integrating code evaluations, video assessments, and reviewer notes—can help mitigate these risks and ensure you hire the right talent for your organization.

## Why This Matters For engineering leaders, the stakes are high. Poor hiring decisions can result in not only financial loss but also impact team morale and project timelines. By automating the technical screening process, you can improve the accuracy of your assessments and reduce the time spent on manual reviews. A

structured approach to evidence gathering also helps to standardize evaluations, making it easier to compare candidates objectively. This leads to better hiring precision and ultimately, higher offer acceptance rates.

## How to Implement It 1. **Establish Evaluation Criteria:** Define the key skills and competencies required for the role. Use these criteria to guide both coding tests and video assessments. 2. **Automate Code Reviews:** Leverage tools that allow candidates to submit code in real-time. Use automated testing frameworks

to assess code quality, efficiency, and adherence to best practices. 3. **Integrate Video Assessments:** Use video platforms to conduct live coding interviews. Record these sessions for later review, ensuring that all evaluations are consistent. 4. **Document Reviewer Notes:** Encourage reviewers to take notes during,

and immediately after, assessments. This transparency aids in dispute resolution and ensures that all evaluations are based on the same criteria. 5. **Set Up Dispute Resolution Workflows:** Create a clear process for addressing disagreements among reviewers. This can include additional assessments or a second round of

Related Resources

Key takeaways

  • Automated evidence packs enhance reproducibility and transparency.
  • A structured review process minimizes disputes and maximizes hiring precision.
  • Continuous monitoring can significantly reduce false acceptances.

Implementation checklist

  • Establish clear criteria for evaluating code submissions.
  • Implement a standardized video review process.
  • Document reviewer notes for transparency.
  • Set up dispute resolution workflows.

Questions we hear from teams

How can automated evidence packs improve hiring precision?
Automated evidence packs streamline the evaluation process, allowing for more objective comparisons and reducing biases.
What tools can I use to implement automated technical screenings?
Consider using platforms that integrate coding assessments, video interviews, and documentation tools to create a comprehensive screening workflow.

Ready to modernize your onboarding process?

Let IntegrityLens help you transform AI-generated chaos into clean, scalable applications.

Schedule a consultation

Related resources